Finding a Reputable Conveyancer · · 11 min read
What Happens If You Don't Vet Your Conveyancer Properly
Skipping proper due diligence on a conveyancer can mean slow communication, hidden fees, and missed details in your paperwork. Here's what actually goes wrong.
Skip the vetting and you're rolling the dice with one of the biggest transactions of your life. Poor communication, missed deadlines, hidden fees that appear right before completion, and in the worst cases a firm that simply can't cope with the workload it's taken on. None of that is guaranteed if you don't check someone out first, but the odds shift firmly against you.
Here's the thing that catches a lot of buyers and sellers out: choosing a conveyancer often feels like a footnote in the house-buying process. You've spent weeks agonising over the property itself, the mortgage rate, the area, the school catchment. Then someone mentions a conveyancer and you think, fine, whoever's cheapest, or whoever the estate agent recommends, job done. That instinct is exactly how people end up stuck mid-transaction with a firm that won't answer the phone.
Quick note before we get into it. I'm a blogger writing about residential conveyancing, not a solicitor and not a licensed conveyancer, so nothing in this article is personal legal advice for your specific situation. Think of it as a practical primer, the kind of thing you'd want to know before you start ringing round for quotes, written from research and general public knowledge about how the UK conveyancing industry works.
What follows covers the real consequences of skipping proper due diligence when you pick a conveyancer, the specific checks worth doing, and what to do if you're already partway through a transaction and starting to worry you picked wrong.
Table of contents
- What "vetting a conveyancer" actually means
- The real consequences of skipping it
- Communication breakdowns and why they matter so much
- Financial surprises: fees, add-ons and hidden charges
- Overloaded firms and capacity problems
- Regulation, registers and how to check credentials
- Red flags worth taking seriously
- What to do if you've already instructed someone
- FAQs about vetting a conveyancer
- Summary and what to do next
What "vetting a conveyancer" actually means
Vetting sounds like a formal, slightly intimidating word, but in practice it just means doing the same basic checks you'd do before hiring any professional for a big job. You wouldn't hand your kitchen renovation to the first builder who quoted, would you? Same principle applies here, except the stakes are arguably higher because a botched conveyancing transaction can cost you the house entirely, not just leave you with a wonky worktop.
At a minimum, proper vetting means confirming the firm or individual is actually regulated to do this work, reading recent reviews with a critical eye, understanding exactly what the quoted fee includes, and getting a sense of how responsive they are before you've even signed anything. It's not about being paranoid. It's about treating the selection process with the seriousness it deserves.
Why buyers and sellers often skip this step
Honestly, most people skip it because conveyancing feels invisible until it isn't. You don't see the work happening, you just get occasional emails, so there's a temptation to treat it as a commodity service where any provider will do roughly the same job. Estate agents sometimes push their own "recommended" conveyancer too, and because that recommendation comes from someone you already trust for the property side, it's easy to assume the vetting has been done for you. It usually hasn't, at least not with your interests specifically in mind.
- The transaction feels administrative rather than risky, so it gets less scrutiny than the mortgage or the survey
- Time pressure, especially when a chain is moving fast and everyone wants to instruct someone immediately
- A misplaced assumption that all conveyancers are more or less interchangeable
- Estate agent referral fees creating a recommendation that isn't necessarily about who's best for you
The real consequences of skipping it
So what actually goes wrong? It's rarely one dramatic disaster. More often it's a slow accumulation of small frustrations that add up to weeks of delay, extra cost, or in a genuinely bad case, a collapsed sale.
Delays that ripple through the whole chain
If you're in a chain, and most people are, your conveyancer's slowness doesn't just affect you. It affects everyone linked to your transaction. A firm that's slow to respond to enquiries, slow to chase searches, or slow to review the contract pack can hold up the entire chain, and chains have a nasty habit of collapsing when patience runs out further down the line.
Missed details in the paperwork
Residential conveyancing involves a lot of document review: title deeds, leases, planning permissions, searches, replies to enquiries. A conveyancer who's rushed, inexperienced, or simply not paying close enough attention can miss something that matters, a restrictive covenant, an unregistered right of way, a missing building regulations certificate for an extension. These things don't always surface immediately. Sometimes they show up years later when you try to sell and the buyer's conveyancer spots the gap.
Money lost to avoidable mistakes
Beyond the fees themselves, mistakes can cost real money. Late exchange penalties, storage costs for removals that get rescheduled at the last minute, even lost deposits in genuinely severe cases where a transaction falls apart because of poor handling. None of this is common, to be clear, but it happens far more often to people who instructed the first name they found than to people who did a bit of homework first.
Communication breakdowns and why they matter so much
If there's one theme that comes up again and again in conveyancing complaints, it's communication, or the lack of it. Not being able to reach your conveyancer for days at a time. Emails going unanswered. No proactive updates, so you're left chasing for basic information like whether searches have come back yet.
This matters more in conveyancing than in a lot of other services because the process is genuinely stressful for most people. You're often juggling a mortgage offer with a deadline, a removals firm, notice periods, sometimes a rental agreement that's ending. Silence from your conveyancer during that period isn't just annoying, it's actively anxiety-inducing, and it can lead to real problems if you don't find out about a hold-up until it's too late to act on it.
Signs communication is already a problem
- Calls and emails routinely take more than two or three working days to get a reply
- You're passed between different staff members with no consistent named contact
- You have to chase for updates rather than receiving them proactively
- Simple questions get vague, non-committal answers
Financial surprises: fees, add-ons and hidden charges
A quote that looks brilliantly cheap can turn out to be misleading once you read the small print. Some firms advertise a low headline fee, then add on charges for things that arguably should have been included from the start: bank transfer fees, ID verification fees, postage, telephone attendance charges, and so on. Individually these might be modest. Stacked together, they can turn a "cheap" quote into one that's actually more expensive than a competitor's honest, all-inclusive fee.
Questions worth asking before you commit
- Does the quote include VAT, or is that added separately later
- What disbursements are estimated versus fixed, and which ones might change
- Is there a genuine no completion, no fee policy, and what exactly does it cover
- Are there charges for things like ID checks, bank transfers, or file storage that aren't in the headline price
- What happens to the fee if the transaction falls through partway through
Getting clear written answers to these questions before you instruct anyone is one of the simplest forms of vetting there is, and it takes maybe ten minutes on the phone or over email.
Overloaded firms and capacity problems
One thing that rarely gets discussed publicly is caseload. Some conveyancers, particularly at high-volume, ultra-low-cost firms, handle an enormous number of files at once. When a single fee earner is juggling well over a hundred active transactions, something has to give, and it's usually responsiveness and attention to detail.
There's nothing wrong with volume conveyancing in principle. Plenty of high-volume firms run efficiently thanks to good systems and support staff. The issue is that as a customer, you generally can't see caseload from the outside. A firm's website looks the same whether they're comfortably staffed or drowning in files. This is exactly the kind of thing proper vetting, through reviews and direct questions, can help surface before you commit.
How to get a sense of a firm's capacity
- Ask directly how many active files your named conveyancer is currently handling
- Ask what their typical turnaround time is for responding to enquiries
- Look at recent reviews specifically for complaints about being "hard to reach" or "went quiet for weeks"
- Ask whether you'll have one named point of contact throughout, or a rotating team
Regulation, registers and how to check credentials
This is the single most important, and easiest, check to do, and it takes about two minutes. Every solicitor practising in England and Wales is regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA). Every licensed conveyancer is regulated by the Council for Licensed Conveyancers (CLC). Both bodies maintain public registers you can search to confirm a firm or individual is genuinely authorised to carry out conveyancing work.
Why this check matters more than it seems
Genuine cases of unregulated individuals posing as conveyancers are, thankfully, rare. But confirming regulation isn't just about ruling out outright fraud. It also confirms the firm carries the professional indemnity insurance that regulated status requires, and that there's a formal complaints process and an ombudsman route available to you if something goes wrong. An unregulated arrangement leaves you with none of that protection.
- Search the SRA register for solicitor firms and individual solicitors
- Search the CLC register for licensed conveyancers and CLC-regulated firms
- Confirm the specific person handling your file, not just the firm name, appears on the relevant register
- Check whether the firm holds professional indemnity insurance, which regulated status generally requires
Red flags worth taking seriously
Some warning signs are obvious once you know to look for them, but easy to miss if you're not paying attention or you're in a hurry to get things moving.
Common red flags
- A quote significantly below every other firm you've compared, with no clear explanation why
- Reluctance to confirm SRA or CLC registration when you ask directly
- No named individual assigned to your case, only a generic team email address
- Pressure to instruct immediately, with vague reasoning about limited availability
- A pattern of recent reviews mentioning unreturned calls or missed deadlines
- No clear written breakdown of fees and disbursements before you commit
None of these on their own is necessarily damning, in fairness. A single bad review can just be one unhappy client. But when two or three of these show up together, it's worth pausing and looking elsewhere rather than hoping for the best.
What to do if you've already instructed someone
Maybe you're reading this after the fact, and you've already got a conveyancer on the go who isn't inspiring confidence. First, don't panic. Plenty of transactions that start slowly still complete successfully once someone applies a bit of pressure or the file finally gets proper attention.
Practical steps if things aren't going well
- Put your concerns in writing (email is fine) so there's a clear record and a deadline for a response
- Ask specifically what stage the transaction is at and what the next milestone is
- Request a named contact if you've been dealing with a rotating cast of staff
- If things genuinely aren't improving, look into your firm's formal complaints procedure, which every regulated firm must have
- As a last resort, you can switch conveyancers mid-transaction, though it's worth weighing the disruption against the benefit before doing so
Switching partway through isn't something to do lightly, since it can cause its own delays while a new firm gets up to speed on the file. But it's not unheard of, and sometimes it's genuinely the right call if communication has completely broken down.
FAQs about vetting a conveyancer
How do I know if my conveyancer is legitimate?
Check whether they appear on the SRA register (for solicitors) or the CLC register (for licensed conveyancers). Both registers are free and public, and confirming registration takes just a couple of minutes.
What happens if I pick a bad conveyancer?
You might experience slow communication, missed details in the paperwork, unexpected extra fees, or in more serious cases, delays severe enough to put the whole transaction at risk. It doesn't happen to everyone, but poor vetting raises the odds considerably.
Can I switch conveyancers partway through a purchase?
Yes, it's possible to switch mid-transaction, although it can introduce delays as a new firm gets up to speed. It's usually worth trying to resolve issues with your current conveyancer first if that's realistic.
Is the cheapest conveyancer usually the worst?
Not necessarily, but an unusually low quote compared with everyone else you've spoken to is worth questioning rather than automatically celebrating. Sometimes it reflects genuine efficiency, sometimes it reflects hidden add-on fees or an overloaded caseload.
How many quotes should I get before choosing a conveyancer?
There's no fixed rule, but comparing at least three quotes gives you a reasonable sense of what's typical for your type of transaction and helps you spot anything that looks unusually cheap or unusually vague.
What's the fastest way to check a conveyancer's reputation?
Read recent independent reviews (rather than only testimonials on the firm's own website), and pay particular attention to any recurring complaints about communication or missed deadlines.
Summary and what to do next
- Skipping proper vetting raises the risk of delays, communication breakdowns, unexpected fees, and in rare cases a transaction falling through
- Confirming SRA or CLC regulation takes minutes and is one of the most important checks you can do
- Get a clear, written breakdown of fees and disbursements before instructing anyone
- Watch for red flags like unusually low quotes, no named contact, or reluctance to confirm credentials
- If you've already instructed someone and things aren't going well, put concerns in writing and ask about the formal complaints process before considering a switch
To be clear, I'm writing this as a blogger who researches and follows the conveyancing industry, not as a solicitor or licensed conveyancer, so none of the above should be treated as advice tailored to your own transaction. The right move if you're unsure about a specific firm or situation is always to raise it directly with a regulated professional.
Need help or have questions?
We're not able to tell you whether a specific conveyancer is right for your transaction, since that's genuinely a matter for you and a qualified professional to work through together. What we can do is point you towards more general guides like this one if there's a particular part of the process you'd like explained in plain English.
If you've got a question about how any of this works, our contact form is the quickest way to reach us, just send it through and we'll get back to you.
This article is written from a blogger's perspective for general information only, and Triangle Legal Services' blog is not a law firm. Please seek personalised advice from a qualified, regulated solicitor or licensed conveyancer before making decisions about your own transaction.