Recommendations From Friends and Family: Are They Reliable

A recommendation from a friend or family member is a genuinely useful starting point when choosing a conveyancer, but it isn't reliable enough to act on alone, because their transaction was different from yours, their experience might be a few years old, and one good outcome doesn't tell you much about how that firm performs under real pressure. Treat it as a lead worth following up properly, not a decision already made for you.

There's something reassuring about a mate saying "just use who we used, they were great," especially when you're staring down a mountain of paperwork and don't fancy comparing five different quotes from strangers. It feels like a shortcut, and in some ways it is. The trouble is that conveyancing is personal and situational in ways that don't always transfer neatly from one house move to another.

Quick disclaimer before we carry on: I'm a blogger, not a solicitor or licensed conveyancer, so nothing here is personal legal advice, just general observations about how personal recommendations tend to work in practice. Every transaction and every firm is different, so always do your own checking on top of anyone's recommendation.

Let's get into why recommendations from friends and family are worth listening to, where they can lead you astray, and how to use one sensibly rather than treating it as gospel.

Table of contents

• Why we trust a friend's recommendation more than a stranger's review
• The genuine strengths of a personal recommendation
• Where personal recommendations quietly fall short
• Why your transaction might be nothing like theirs
• Timing, staff changes, and why "great last year" can mean little now
• Survivorship bias in what gets recommended
• How to use a recommendation well, rather than blindly
• Combining recommendations with your own research
• FAQs about conveyancer recommendations
• Summary and what to do next

Why we trust a friend's recommendation more than a stranger's review

There's a good psychological reason personal recommendations feel more trustworthy than an anonymous online review. You know the person. You trust their judgement in other areas of life. And crucially, they have nothing to gain from steering you wrong, unlike a review that might be shaped by all sorts of things you can't see.

What makes it feel like solid evidence

• You can ask follow-up questions directly and get honest, detailed answers
• You already trust the person's general judgement from other areas of life
• There's no incentive for them to exaggerate or mislead you
• It feels like a shortcut through a confusing, unfamiliar decision

All of that is genuinely true, and it's exactly why a personal recommendation carries real weight. The catch is that trusting the person isn't quite the same as the recommendation itself being reliable evidence about a specific firm's overall quality.

Why this distinction is so easy to miss

The confusion happens because we're used to trusting people, not firms, in most areas of life. If a friend recommends a good plumber or a reliable mechanic, that trust usually transfers reasonably well, because those jobs tend to be fairly consistent from one visit to the next. Conveyancing is a bit different. It's a longer process, involving more moving parts and more people outside anyone's control, which means a single good experience is a weaker predictor of your own outcome than it would be for a smaller, one-off job.

The genuine strengths of a personal recommendation

Before getting into the limitations, it's worth being fair about what a good recommendation actually gives you, because it's more than nothing.

What a solid recommendation can tell you

• That at least one real transaction with this firm went reasonably well, which is more than you know about a firm with no track record you can access
• Specific, honest detail about communication style, since you can ask your friend directly rather than relying on a vague star rating
• A sense of roughly what fees were charged, which can be a useful benchmark even if prices have since changed
• Whether the firm handled a particular complication well, if their transaction happened to involve one

None of this is nothing. A detailed, honest account from someone you trust is genuinely more informative, word for word, than most anonymous reviews. It's just not the whole picture on its own.

Why the detail matters more than the verdict

The real value in a personal recommendation usually isn't the headline verdict of "they were great," it's the specific detail underneath it. Knowing that your friend's conveyancer called them back within a couple of hours every time, or explained a leasehold quirk clearly without being asked twice, tells you far more than the general enthusiasm does. It's worth digging past the summary and asking for the actual specifics, since that's where the genuinely useful information tends to live.

Where personal recommendations quietly fall short

The limitations of a personal recommendation are easy to overlook precisely because the source feels so trustworthy. But trustworthy doesn't mean complete.

The gaps that matter

• A single experience is a sample size of one, and one data point doesn't reliably predict future performance
• Your friend's transaction may have been simpler, or more complicated, than yours in ways that changed how well the firm coped
• They may have been assigned a specific conveyancer within the firm who has since left or moved on
• People sometimes downplay minor frustrations once everything's completed and the stress has faded, remembering the outcome more fondly than the process felt at the time

Why "it went fine" doesn't tell you very much

Most conveyancing transactions do go reasonably fine, in the sense that they eventually complete without a catastrophe. That's a low bar. "It went fine" doesn't tell you whether it went fine because the conveyancer was excellent, or fine despite the conveyancer being mediocre, simply because nothing especially complicated came up to expose any weaknesses.

Why your transaction might be nothing like theirs

Two house purchases can look superficially similar and still be completely different underneath, in ways that change how demanding the conveyancing actually is.

Factors that change the difficulty of a transaction

• Freehold versus leasehold, which involves an entirely different set of checks and potential complications
• Whether you're part of a chain, and how many links that chain has
• Whether the property has any unusual features, such as a flying freehold, unregistered title, or recent structural work
• Whether you're using a mortgage, and how straightforward or demanding that particular lender's requirements are

A friend who bought a straightforward freehold house with no chain had a genuinely different experience, structurally, from someone buying a leasehold flat in a three-way chain. The same firm might handle one brilliantly and the other only adequately, purely because the second one is inherently harder to get right.

A practical example worth picturing

Picture two siblings who both used the same firm a year apart. One bought a new-build flat directly from a developer, a fairly standardised process with well-trodden paperwork. The other bought an older leasehold conversion with a management company that took weeks to reply to basic enquiries. The firm handling both cases might genuinely be excellent, and yet one sibling's story would sound like a dream and the other's like a slog, purely because of what they were buying rather than anything the conveyancer did differently.

Timing, staff changes, and why "great last year" can mean little now

Time changes things, and conveyancing firms are no exception. A recommendation based on an experience from several years ago deserves a bit less weight than one from a few months back.

What can shift between then and now

• The specific conveyancer your friend dealt with may no longer work at that firm
• The firm may have grown quickly, taking on more files than its current staffing comfortably supports
• Management, ownership or internal systems may have changed since the recommendation was made
• Fee structures may have shifted, so the price your friend mentioned might be well out of date

It's worth simply asking when their transaction happened, and if it was more than a year or two ago, treating the recommendation as a useful starting point rather than a current guarantee.

Survivorship bias in what gets recommended

There's a subtler issue worth understanding too. People are more likely to actively recommend a firm after things went well, and less likely to bring up a firm at all if things went badly, unless specifically asked.

How this quietly skews what you hear

• You're more likely to hear enthusiastic recommendations than cautionary tales, simply because people prefer sharing good news
• Someone who had a poor experience might just avoid mentioning the firm entirely rather than warning people off it directly
• This means the recommendations reaching you are naturally skewed towards the positive, even before you factor in anything else

None of this means recommendations are dishonest. It just means the flow of information you receive from friends and family tends to lean positive by default, which is worth bearing in mind rather than assuming you're getting a balanced picture automatically.

Why asking around a bit wider helps

If you mention a firm to a few different people, rather than acting on the first recommendation you hear, you sometimes get a more rounded picture. Someone else in your circle might have used the same firm and had a noticeably different experience, which is genuinely useful information rather than a contradiction to dismiss. Hearing only one account, however positive, means you're working with a smaller sample than you might realise.

How to use a recommendation well, rather than blindly

A recommendation is most useful when you treat it as the start of your research rather than the end of it.

Questions worth asking the person who recommended a firm

1. When did your transaction take place, roughly?
2. Was your purchase or sale freehold or leasehold, and was there a chain involved?
3. Did anything unexpected come up, and how did the firm handle it?
4. Did you deal with the same named person throughout, or a rotating team?
5. Roughly what did you pay, and did the final figure match the original quote?
6. Would you use them again for a different type of transaction, or specifically the same type?

These questions turn a vague "they were great" into something genuinely useful: specific detail you can weigh against your own transaction's likely demands.

It's worth asking these questions even when the recommendation comes from someone very close to you, like a parent or sibling. Family members sometimes soften their account slightly, not wanting to sound like they're complaining about a decision they made themselves, so a few gentle, specific questions can surface detail that a general "no complaints" answer would otherwise hide.

Combining recommendations with your own research

The strongest approach uses a recommendation as one input alongside your own independent checks, rather than relying on it exclusively.

A sensible way to combine the two

• Take the recommended firm and get a written quote, just as you would with any other option
• Read a spread of recent online reviews for that firm too, not just your friend's account
• Confirm the firm is properly regulated by the SRA or the CLC
• Ask your own direct questions about communication style, typical caseload, and timescales
• Compare the recommended firm against at least one other option, rather than instructing them purely on trust

This doesn't take much longer than simply going with the recommendation blindly, and it gives you a much fuller picture before you commit to what's likely to be one of the bigger transactions of your life.

Think of it as layering evidence rather than choosing between sources. A recommendation gives you a warm lead and some honest first-hand detail. Reviews give you a wider sample from people you don't know personally. A written quote and your own direct questions give you evidence specific to right now, rather than to whenever your friend's transaction happened. None of these three things does the whole job alone, but together they cover each other's blind spots reasonably well.

FAQs about conveyancer recommendations

Should I just use the conveyancer my friend recommended?
It's a reasonable starting point, but it's worth doing your own checks too, such as reading recent reviews and getting a written quote, rather than instructing them purely on trust.

Does a recommendation mean I don't need to compare other quotes?
Not really; comparing at least one or two other quotes helps you judge whether the recommended firm's pricing and service genuinely stack up well against the alternatives.

Why might a recommended conveyancer not work out as well for me?
Your transaction might be more complex, involve a different property type, or simply reach the firm at a busier or quieter time than your friend's did, all of which can affect the experience.

Is an old recommendation still worth following?
It can still be a useful starting point, but ask when the transaction happened, since staffing and service levels at a firm can change noticeably over a few years.

What if several people recommend the same conveyancer?
Multiple independent recommendations do carry more weight than just one, though it's still worth checking recent reviews and getting your own written quote before deciding.

How do I politely decline if a recommended firm doesn't feel right for me?
You're free to choose whichever conveyancer suits your own transaction best; most people won't mind, and you can simply explain you compared a few options and went with what felt right for your specific situation.

Is a recommendation more reliable than an online review?
It's often more detailed and honest since you can ask direct follow-up questions, but it's still based on a single experience, so it's worth treating it as one useful data point alongside reviews rather than a replacement for them.

What if a family member recommends a firm but a review site shows mixed feedback?
It's worth asking your relative about the specific details of their experience and comparing that against what the mixed reviews describe, since both pieces of information are genuinely useful together.

Summary and what to do next

• Recommendations from friends and family are genuinely useful, but they reflect a single transaction, not a guarantee
• Ask detailed follow-up questions rather than accepting "they were great" at face value
• Consider how similar your transaction is to theirs, since freehold, leasehold, chains and mortgages all change the difficulty
• Weight recent recommendations more heavily than ones from several years ago
• Combine any recommendation with your own reviews, written quotes and direct questions before instructing anyone

Everything in this article is general commentary from a blogger's perspective, not a solicitor's or licensed conveyancer's, and it isn't personalised legal advice for your own situation. Always do your own research alongside any recommendation, and speak to a qualified professional if you need advice specific to your transaction.

Need help or have questions?

We're not solicitors or licensed conveyancers, so we can't tell you whether a specific recommended firm is right for you, but if you've got a general question about choosing a conveyancer, we're happy to point you towards more of our guides on the topic.

Our contact form is the quickest way to reach us, just send your question through and we'll get back to you.

Send us your question →

One last reminder that this is a blog, not a law firm, so please don't treat it as a substitute for real legal advice. Speak to a qualified solicitor or licensed conveyancer for guidance tailored to your own move.